Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Barr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Mercure, J. P.

Appeal (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 16, 1998, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed September 3, 1999, which, inter alia, upon reconsideration, modified its prior decision.

We reject claimant’s attacks on the decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits because he was not totally unemployed during a period when he worked as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SilversteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of SotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. People v. DugganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. In re the Claim of Le PoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Claim of FarinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KansuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of AloiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of PetvaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of SeverinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API