Legal Opinion
In re Kurtz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 1, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 28, 2005, which, inter aha, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.
Claimant held a probationary position as an art teacher working for the Rush Henrietta Central School District during the 2003-2004 school year. Although her position was abolished effective July 1, 2004, the District offered her a position as a long-term substitute art teacher for the first semester of the 2004-2005 school year to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of GuzenskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of AloiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of FaillaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of SchirraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of StehnachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of NewmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007