Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 27, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 23, 2004, which ruled that claimant was eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant, a substitute teacher for the South Colonie Central School District, was called to teach approximately three times a week during the 2003-2004 school year. At the conclusion of that school year, she was advised that she would remain on the substitute list and would continue to be contacted during the following school year. The letter, however, did not inform claimant of the number of days that she could expect to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of MakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of AloiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LincolnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of PapapietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Matter of Upham (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. Matter of Rosenbaum (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API