Legal Opinion
Artukovich v. Astendorf
California Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1942No. L. A. 18179PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPENCE, J. pro tern.
— Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendants’ demurrers to the complaint as amended without further leave to amend.
The complaint, which was filed ón May 17, 1940, alleged that plaintiff, a minor of the age of 16 years and a ward of the juvenile court, was being transported on June 25, 1939, to a forest camp in a county truck driven by defendant Astendorf, a deputy probation officer and an employee of the defendant county of Los Angeles, and that while being so transported said Astendorf so negligently operated said…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Johnson v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hurley v. Town of BinghamUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Davidson v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Turner v. StaggsNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.