Legal Opinion

Howell v. Ketchikan Pulp Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1997No. S-7137PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Steven Howell appeals the superior court’s summary judgment for Ketchikan Pulp Company (KPC) on Howell’s breach of contract and breach of warranty claims. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Howell was employed as a pipefitter by Qualified Contractors, Inc. (QCI). QCI, through its parent company General Electric (GE), had a contract with KPC to repair KPC’s boilers and other machines. While repairing a KPC boiler, Howell was injured by the explosion of another boiler in KPC’s plant. He was struck in the back with jagged metal, inhaled noxious gases,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Continental Insurance Company v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Breck v. MooreAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bishop v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rathke v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Smallwood v. Central Peninsula General HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hemond v. Frontier Communications of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Yost v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API