Legal Opinion

Breck v. Moore

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1996No. S-5435, S-5445PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Frank Moore and Sandra Moore sued William H. Breck, an attorney, and Safeco Title Agency, Inc. (Safeco) for failing to adequately warn them of building and sewage disposal restrictions on land they eventually purchased. They filed suit promptly after discovery of the restrictions, but many years after closing. The trial court granted summary judgment for Safeco, based on the statute of limitations. After a bench trial, the court granted judgment in favor of the Moores against Breck, but awarded only partial damages and no attorney’s fees or costs *602against Breck. Breck…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Sopko v. Dowell Schlumberger, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API