Legal Opinion

McDowell v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1998No. S-7559PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Property owners filed suit alleging injuries to real property caused by petroleum contamination. The superior court dismissed the negligence and strict liability claims, on the ground they were barred by the two-year statute of limitations, AS 09.10.070. Because we conclude that these claims alleged “trespass upon real property” and were subject to the six-year statute of limitations, AS 09.10.050(2), we reverse and remand.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Sam E. McDowell and A. Joyce McDowell own certain real property in Sterling. 1 Thomas L. Edwards and Rayme…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  3. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Kodiak Electric Ass'n v. Delaval Turbine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Parks Hiway Enterprises, LLC v. CEM Leasing, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API