Legal Opinion

City of Barnsdall v. Barnsdall Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 29, 1938No. 26045PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The defendant below has appealed. We will generally refer to the parties as plaintiffs and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiffs’ action is founded upon the fact that one Hammer, who at the time was vice president and active managing officer of the bank, and at the same time treasurer of the defendant city, paid by draft drawn by him on the hank two interest coupons for the city, totaling $6,015, and plaintiffs seek recovery upon the theory that the bank received no reimbursement therefor from the city. The drafts were drawn January 29. 1923, and July 31, 1923. It was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shull v. Town of AvantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Teachers Conservative Investment Ass'n v. EnglandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Dempsey Oil & Gas Co. v. Citizens' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. City of Barnsdall v. Barnsdall Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Board of Com'rs v. State Nat. Bank of IdabelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fessler v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Alexander v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Fulton v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Neff v. CohenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Kickbusch v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API