Legal Opinion
Shull v. Town of Avant
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 12, 1932No. 22517PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This 'is an appeal from a judgjment of the district count of Osage county decreeing that the claim of the defendant in error, the town of Avant, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, was a preferred claim against the assets of the Avant State Bank, an insolvent banking-corporation in the hands of the plaintiffs in error, the successors in interest of that bank, hereinafter referred to as the defendant.
The record discloses that the Avant State Bank was insolvent and was taken over for liquidation by the State Bank Commissioner on December 27, 1929. L. A. Justus was duly appointed and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Diego County v. California Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
- Bank of Blackwell v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Multnomah County v. Oregon Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1894
- National Surety Co. v. PixtonUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Shull v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- City of Barnsdall v. Barnsdall Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Exchange Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- In Re Farmers State Bank of GarberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Rider v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.