Legal Opinion
Neff v. Cohen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 31, 1950No. 33465PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The parties to this action, in the trial court, were in reverse relative positions. (Miss) L. B. Neff was defendant, and Max G. Cohen was plaintiff. They will be so designated herein.
The trial court entered judgment against the defendant for specific performance, in which the defendant is ordered to make and execute to plaintiff a warranty deed to lot 9, block 2, Horner Addition to the city of Tulsa. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.
The record discloses that on November 16, 1945, the defendant signed a contract with plaintiff, who is an attorney at law. That portion of the contract,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hartzell v. CrumbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Clement Mortgage Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City of Barnsdall v. Barnsdall Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ace Realty, Inc. v. LooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Anderson v. PickeringCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975