Legal Opinion

Teachers Conservative Investment Ass'n v. England

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1926No. 16068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTI-I, O.

The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiffs I. E. England and E. E. Harrell allege that on March 2, 1918, they executed a certain oil and gas lease on 40 acres of land in Stephens county, to the defendant, and that plaintiffs agreed to lease the same for a period of five years, but through a mutual mistake the lease was made to run for a period of ten years, and they seek to reform the same to conform to what they allege in their petition was their original intention and agreement. Defendant admits the execution of the lease, but…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Nowka v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Parks v. Sinai Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Marshall v. HomierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Fast v. GilbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Oklahoma City Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. SharrockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Flag-Redfern Oil CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API