Legal Opinion

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. Berry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1891No. 337PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Dubois Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

This action was commenced by John Berry against the Louisville, Evansville and St. Louis Consolidated Railroad Company to recover damages for the loss of services of his minor son, who is alleged to have been killed by the carelessness of such company.

*429The complaint alleges, in substance, that Henry E. Berry, the plaintiff’s son, was eighteen years of age, and was employed by the defendant to work in its engine-house at Huntingburg as an “engine washer,” which was a reasonably safe employment; that said Henry was inexperienced, and unfamiliar with machinery, and unacquainted with the dangerous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Marks v. ReissingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Marston v. Pickwick Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Citizens' Street Railroad Co. of Indianapolis v. StoddardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Parke County Coal Co. v. BarthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ParishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API