Legal Opinion

Marston v. Pickwick Stages, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1926No. Docket No. 4473PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a collision between an automobile driven by plaintiff and an autostage operated in the business of the defendant Pickwick Stages, Inc., and driven by its employee, the defendant Vallad. The answer of each defendant, in addition to denying the allegations of the complaint, pleads contributory negligence as an affirmative defense. The verdict was for plaintiff. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The latter appeal must be dismissed. No appeal lies from an order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bosqui v. Sutro R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hardy v. SchirmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bain, Admx. v. MattmillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API