Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Parish

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1902No. 3,897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Erom Wayne Circuit Court; H. G. Fox, Judge. Action by Clara Parish, administratrix, against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company for damages. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, P. J.

Appellee sued for damages for the alleged negligent hilling of her intestate. Demurrers to each of the two paragraphs of complaint overruled. Verdict in appellee’s favor. Motion for a new trial overruled. Judgment on the verdict. The errors assigned and argued question the rulings on the demurrers and the denial of a new trial.

The averments of the first paragraph upon the questions of negligence and freedom, from contributory negligence are, substantially, that on the 21st day of July, 1898, decedent was a freight conductor, and as such it was necessary, in the proper management of trains, to…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Consolidated Stone Co. v. SummitIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Johnson v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Greenleaf v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Town of Argos v. HarleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Northern Alabama Railway Co. v. MansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  5. Smith v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API