Legal Opinion
Airtouch Cellular v. City of El Cajon
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 10, 2000No. Civ. 99-1801-B LABPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.(1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND/OR FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: FIRST AND SIXTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
I. Introduction
Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment re: First and Sixth Claims for Relief, and (2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication of Issues.
II. Background
The zoning ordinances of the City of El Cajon (hereinafter “City”) permit cellular antennas in any zone provided a conditional use permit is granted.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Metropcs, Inc. v. The City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- MetroPCS, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- MetroPCS, Inc. v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
- VOICE STREAM PCS I, LLC v. City of HillsboroDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2004
- California RSA No. 4 v. Madera CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.