Legal Opinion
MetroPCS, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 7, 2005No. 03-16759, 03-16760PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CUDAHY; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.
*718OPINION
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge:
MetroPCS brought thé instant action iii the District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that a decision by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors denying MetroPCS permission to construct a wireless telecommunications antenna atop a city parking garage violated several provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996(TCA). Specifically, Me-troPCS alleged that the Board’s decision (1) was not “in writing” as required by the TCA, (2) was not supported by substantial…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. WillothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Metropcs, Inc. v. The City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Bradshaw v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- Sprint Spectrum, LP v. Platte County, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Liberty Towers, LLC v. Zoning Hearing BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.P. v. County Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.