Metropcs, Inc. v. The City And County Of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
400 F.3d 715
METROPCS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
The CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and The Board of Supervisors of the City of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
No. 03-16759.
No. 03-16760.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted October 4, 2004.
Filed March 7, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Martin L. Fineman, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee.
William K. Sanders, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees/cross-appellants.
James…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Town of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- T-Mobile South, LLC v. City of RoswellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Budnick v. Town of CarefreeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government Wyandotte County KsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. City of CranstonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Pullom v. United States BakeryDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.