Legal Opinion
VOICE STREAM PCS I, LLC v. City of Hillsboro
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 2, 2004No. Civil 03-365-MOPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MOSMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Voice Stream PCS I, LLC (“plaintiff’) brings this lawsuit under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TCA”), seeking to overturn the City of Hillsboro’s decision to deny plaintiffs conditional-use application to erect a wireless-telecommunications (or, as commonly called, a “cellphone”) tower in a residentially zoned area. The issues in this case pit the TCA’s intention to deregulate the wireless telephone industry against the traditional control over local land use maintained by municipalities. For the reasons discussed below, municipal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- T-MOBILE SOUTH LLC v. City of Jacksonville, Fla.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
- T-MOBILE USA, INC. v. City of AnacortesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Sprint Telephony PCS, LP v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- PI Telecom Infrastructure, LLC v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Town of IslipDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.