Legal Opinion

Emmco Insurance Company v. Howell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1963No. 1 Div. 18PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

The appellee here, was the plaintiff below. He brought suit against the appellant here, defendant below, to recover damages allegedly due under an insurance policy whereby the appellant had insured the appellee and Associates Discount Corporation “as their interests may appear” against any loss due to collision of an automobile purchased by the appellee.

Trial resulted in a verdict for the appellee, damages being assessed at $2,181.91, and judgment was entered pursuant to the verdict. Appellant’s motion for a new trial being overruled, appeal was perfected to this court. -

From…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Madden v. Nippon Auto Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mobile Auto Co. v. SturgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Scruggs & Echols v. RiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Newton v. WilderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pepin v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Miller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Thompson Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Langford v. Federated Guaranty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. United States Casualty Co. v. Porto Rican & American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API