Pepin v. City of Danbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiffs, Danbury residents and taxpayers, brought this action against the city and certain of its officials seeking a declaratory judgment determining the validity of the tax formula provision contained in article Y, §4, of the consolidation ordinance of the city of Danbury, and the levy of real estate taxes pursuant thereto, and, in addition, for appropriate equitable relief.
The case was heard on a stipulation of facts which disclosed the following: Prior to January 1, 1965, the city of Danbury consisted of two municipal entities known as the town of Danbury and the city of Danbury.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. GoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RinaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.