Legal Opinion

New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1955No. 1 Div. 639PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit by the insured, appellee, against the insurer, appellant, on a policy of insurance covering a tractor-trailer for damages resulting from a collision or upset. The suit was tried on a plea of the general issue and special plea No. 5.

Plea No. 3 refers to* the policy which contains the “automobile endorsement”, by which “loss, damage or returned premium, if any, under the said policy shall be payable as provided in said policy to Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corporation and B. IT. Curtis, Jr. (plaintiff) as their interests in the property insured under this policy may appear”.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Penticost v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Peet & Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. J. R. Watkins Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Fleming v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Clark v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Southern Railway Company v. TerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Alabama Dept. of Transp. v. LAND ENERGYSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Ideal Structures Corporation v. Levine Huntsville Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API