Newton v. Wilder
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The action was for damages to plaintiff’s automobile resulting from a collision with defendant’s automobile. The collision is charged to the negligence of defendant in operating his ear.
One of the main issues was the extent of injury to plaintiff’s car.
While a considerable divergence may be expected in such cases, in this case evidence on the one hand tends to show a virtual destruction of the car in point of value, a damage of some $400, while on the other there is evidence of superficial injuries, fully reparable at cost of $15 to $20.
The plaintiff, on direct examination, testified the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Hill Grocery Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Warrant Warehouse Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Southern Ry. Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thompson Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
- Emmco Insurance Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Ham v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976