Legal Opinion

Madden v. Nippon Auto Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1922No. 16746PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Brinker, J., entered March 15,1921, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages to an automobile sustained in a collision.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The automobile of the appellant and the automobile of the respondent, while being driven on a public street in the city of Tacoma, collided, in*619juring both automobiles. The respondent, charging the fault to the appellant’s driver, brought this action to recover in damages. The jury returned a verdict in his favor in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars, and from the judgment entered on the verdict, this appeal is prosecuted.

The first assignment of error discussed in the appellant’s brief is that the court too- narrowly restricted the cross-examination of the respondent’s witness who testified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carnego v. Crescent Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Alexander v. Al G. Barnes Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Abrahamson v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Holmes v. RaffoWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Baldwin v. MittryIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kinchen v. HansbroughLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API