Langford v. Federated Guaranty Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HORNSBY, Chief Justice.
Phillip Langford appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Federated Guaranty Insurance Company.1 Langford had sued Federated, alleging fraud and breach of contract in Federated’s handling of his insurance claim.
The trial court in its order granting summary judgment found, and the parties do not disagree, the following facts to be undisputed:
“UNDISPUTED FACTS
“On or about the 8th day of January, 1986 plaintiff purchased a policy of insurance from Federated Guaranty Mutual Insurance Company which has since changed its name to Alfa Mutual General Insurance Company (Alfa…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Asphalt International, Inc. v. Enterprise Shipping Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Kikendall v. American Progressive Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Emmco Insurance Company v. HowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Spivy-Johnson Portrait Co. v. Belt Automobile Indemnity Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Newton v. United Chambers Insured PlansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pritchett v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Phoenix Aviation, Inc. v. Southern Pine Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005