Blackman v. Burrows
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLE, J. *
In this medical malpractice action plaintiff and appellant Mary Blackman (appellant) alleges that defendant and respondent Ralph Burrows, M.D. (respondent) negligently performed a procedure known as a pantopaque myelogram upon her. The specific allegation is that the procedure was so conducted as to allow her to fall from a table after insertion of a radioactive dye and that respondent failed to remove the dye from her body after the fall. Respondent moved for summary judgment, the motion was granted, a subsequent motion for reconsideration was denied, and summary judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bailey v. TaaffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Brown v. NewbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gilbertson v. OsmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by24 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- North Coast Business Park v. Nielsen Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.