Legal Opinion
North Coast Business Park v. Nielsen Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1993No. D015569PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
North Coast Business Park (North Coast) appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by Erreca, Inc. (Erreca). Erreca’s motion was based on the statute of limitations. The trial court concluded (1) there was no triable issue of fact as to when North Coast first had notice of the defective condition; and (2) the statute of limitations applicable to North Coast’s claim had expired.
On appeal, North Coast claims there was a triable issue of fact because the defect of which it had notice was different from the defect…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Regents of University of California v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Sommer v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Lantzy v. Centex HomesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.