United Community Church v. Garcin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL, J.
Properly conceived and executed, motions for summary adjudication of issues encourage settlement, reduce trial time, save money for the *330parties and preserve limited judicial resources. Ill-conceived and improperly executed motions for summary adjudication have just the opposite effect— they waste time and money and, almost as certainly as night follows day, result in reversals and further litigation. This case presents a paradigm of the latter form of motion and we therefore reverse a judgment predicated on an earlier order adjudicating three issues in a legal malpractice…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Weiss v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- King v. United Parcel Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.