Legal Opinion

Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1985No. B005755PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

Introduction

Plaintiff Steven Lawrence Reid (plaintiff and/or Reid) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant/respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). Plaintiff Reid, a permissive user of an automobile insured by State Farm, filed a complaint alleging breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by State Farm for allowing destruction of an automobile which was involved in an accident while he was driving, thereby disenabling him from proving up allegations against other defendants. We affirm.

Background

On…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Hirsch v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Garcia v. Rockwell Internat. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Petrik v. Monarch Printing Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API