Legal Opinion

Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 21, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.

This case involves a construction of the statute entitled “Unfair Sales Act,” R. S. 1954, Chap. 184. Plaintiff here has brought an action at law seeking treble damages resulting from alleged advertising, offers to sell, and sales below cost with intent to injure competitors, including the plaintiff, and to destroy competition. The defendant is a manufacturer and producer alleged to be selling its product at wholesale and retail. By special demurrer the defendant raises several legal issues, perhaps the most important of which is the vital question as to whether the statute under consideration…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rust v. GriggsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Blum v. EngelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Associated Merchants v. OrmesherMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Daniel Loughran Co. v. Lord Baltimore Candy & Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. State v. Intoxicating LiquorsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Shapiro Bros. Shoe Co. v. Lewiston-Auburn Shoeworkers Protective Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. Stanton v. Trustees of St. Joseph's CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. So-Lo Oil Co. v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Insurance CommissionerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API