Legal Opinion

Daniel Loughran Co. v. Lord Baltimore Candy & Tobacco Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 4, 1940No. [No. 32, January Term, 1940.]PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The appellants and the appellees in this appeal are all wholesale tobacco distributors engaged in the business of selling at wholesale in the City of Baltimore, and elsewhere, among other things cigarettes of various brands, including especially the brands set forth in the record; and the suit was brought by the appellants against the appellees in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City.

The bill alleges that since the first day of June, 1939, the appellees have engaged in the aforesaid business in competition with the appellants in said city, and that contrary to the policy of chapter 248…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Pressman v. State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API