Legal Opinion
Blum v. Engelman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 25, 1948No. [No. 86, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
The purpose of this suit is to restrain violation of the Unfair Sales Act of Maryland, and the constitutionality of the Act has been challenged. Laws of 1941, ch. 330, Laws of 1943, ch. 803, Code Supp. 1943, Art. 83, secs. 111-115.
The suit was instituted in Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City by Benjamin Engelman and David Engelman, trading as M. Engelman & Sons, who have been selling cigarettes at retail at 27 North Howard Street. They allege in their bill of complaint that Abraham Blum, trading as Ben’s Cut Rate Store at 305 North Eutaw Street, has been selling Camel, Chesterfield, Lucky…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Commonwealth v. ZasloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Goldsmith v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- State v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Governor of the State v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Fogle v. H & G Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Maryland Medical Service, Inc. v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Tidewater/Havre De Grace, Inc. v. Mayor of Havre De GraceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.