Legal Opinion

Associated Merchants v. Ormesher

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1939No. 7,885PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from violating the provisions of Chapter 80, Laws of 1937, in their business of merchandising as grocers. To the complaint charging its violation, defendants first filed a demurrer. The demurrer being overruled, they filed an answer putting in issue the allegations of the complaint, and asserting by affirmative defenses that Chapter 80, and particularly section 3 thereof, is unconstitutional as in violation of certain specified sections of the state and federal Constitutions. The reply denied the affirmative allegations of the answer.

The cause…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Hygrade Provision Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Atty. Gen. Of New York Lewis & Fox Co. v. Same. Satz v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZasloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. Hartsock-Flesher Candy Co. v. Wheeling Wholesale Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lane Distributors, Inc. v. TiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API