Legal Opinion

Rust v. Griggs

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1938PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This bill was filed by the complainants Rust and La-nier, partners engaged in the retail grocery business in Nashville, against defendant Griggs, engaged in a’ similar business in Nashville, to restrain the latter from certain business practices charged to have been within the denunciation of chapter 69 of the Public Acts of 1937. A demurrer was filed by defendant which challenged the construction put upon the act by complainants, and also challenged the validity of the act as a whole. The chancellor overruled the demurrer and granted the injunction as prayed. The defendant, electing to stand…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co. v. MorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ashby v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Commonwealth v. ZasloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. Hartsock-Flesher Candy Co. v. Wheeling Wholesale Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API