Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1999No. 89,496PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issues on appeal are: [1] Were the actions taken by the Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County [commissioners] effective to change the county’s 1996-1997 fiscal-year budget (a) through the June ¾, 1996 resolution disapproving a salary supplement for the district attorney (and his assistants) or (b) through the January 21, 1997 resolution that confined claims for the budgeted salary supplement to only the first half of the fiscal year? and [2] Is a county-funded salary supplement for the district attorney — initially authorized by the *1133terms of 1'9 O.S.Supp.1996 §…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Glasco v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API