Democratic Party of Oklahoma v. Estep
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
This original proceeding tenders for judicial testing the constitutional validity of the Oklahoma Campaign Finance Act [Act].1 Important first-impression questions are presented as to the legality of public subsidy for campaign-related activities of candidates and their parties. The issue for decision is whether it is constitutionally permissible to use public funds in payment for campaign-related expenses of candidates for public office and of political parties. We find the controversy over this issue lacks justiciability because the Act is devoid of an articulate…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy DSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Greater Tulsa v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.