Handspur v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
Melvin Earl Handspur, appellant, appeals from a conviction for burglary of a habitation. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at thirty years’ confinement. In his sole point of error, appellant complains of the admission of improperly authenticated pen packets. The recent decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals in Reed v. State, No. 222-90 (Tex.Crim.App. May 9, 1990), is dis-positive of the issue in this case. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dingler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Rodasti v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Rodasti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Rodasti v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Roy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- State v. HandsburCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Handspur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.