Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 9, 1990No. 05-88-01025-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURNETT, Justice.

Jerry Reed appeals his conviction for possession of heroin. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, at twenty years’ confinement. Appellant raises two points of error. Because we agree with appellant that the trial court erred at the punishment stage in admitting a pen packet not properly authenticated, we reverse and remand.

The indictment charging appellant with the possession of heroin contained two enhancement paragraphs. The trial court found the allegations in the first enhancement paragraph to be not true. The trial court found the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte KlasingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Dingler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Ex Parte BrownCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Kingsley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  5. Rodasti v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Gann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  4. Handspur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Handspur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API