Legal Opinion

Dingler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1989No. 0285-87PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

W.C. DAVIS, Judge.

We granted the State Prosecuting Attorney and District Attorney petitions to review whether the Court of Appeals misconstrued Todd v. State, 598 S.W.2d 286 (Tex.Cr.App.1980), in holding that the pen packets had not been properly certified and authenticated under the provisions of Art. 3731a, § 4, V.A.C.S., by the custodian of the records of the Department of Corrections since the copies of the judgments in the pen packets did not reflect whether the certification by the District Clerk appears *306on the originals. See Dingler…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Blakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Dingler v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1987

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Soliz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  4. Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Rodasti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API