Roy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON RECONSIDERATION ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
KINKEADE, Justice.
Pursuant to rule 101 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we withdraw our earlier opinion issued on February 7, 1991, and substitute the following opinion. Tex. R.App.P. 101.
James Roy appeals his conviction for felony escape. After a jury trial, the jury assessed punishment at twenty years’ confinement. In ten points of error, Roy claims that (1) the presiding judge improperly presided over the trial; (2) the trial court erred when it overruled his objection to the State’s use of peremptory challenges to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- DeGarmo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- European Crossroads' Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Criswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
- Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Anthony Demarco Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Billy Jay Burris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.