Legal Opinion

Rodasti v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided May 17, 1990No. 01-87-00785-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has remanded Rodasti v. State, 749 S.W.2d 161 (Tex.App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1988) (Ro-dasti I), remanded per curiam, Rodasti v. State, 786 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (Rodasti II), to us for further consideration of appellant’s points of error in light of Dingler v. State, 768 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). We withdraw our prior opinion in Rodasti I, and substitute the following one. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for another punishment hearing.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault with the use of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Dingler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Rodasti v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Rodasti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Gann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  4. Handspur v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Salinas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API