Rodasti v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUGGAN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault with the use of a deadly weapon. After finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, it assessed punishment at life imprisonment. Appellant asserts two points of error.
In his first point of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred at the punishment stage of the trial in admitting State’s exhibit 6, a Texas Department of Corrections pen packet, because it was not properly authenticated.
Specifically, he complains that the pen packet was not admissible because the copies of the judgment and sentence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Blakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Wyble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Reed v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Rodasti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Rodasti v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.