Swindell v. Overton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
In its opinion, the Court of Appeals held that pursuant to N.C.G.S. 45-21.34, .35, Judge Peel had correctly entered summary judgment for defendants Overton, Cahoon, and Credle as to plaintiffs’ right to injunctive relief in this matter. “Once the Clerk’s Order of Confirmation is entered, an action for injunctive relief will not lie. . . .” 62 N.C. App. at 166, 302 S.E. 2d at 845. The opinion further concluded, at least by implication, that the plaintiffs Swindell are also barred from the remedy of setting aside the foreclosure sale on the same grounds that their action was not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mills v. . Building Loan Assn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Davis v. . DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Foust v. Gate City Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Roberson v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Bank of America v. AdamsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Rosenberg v. SmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.