Legal Opinion

Weir v. . Weir

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1928PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.,

after stating the case: That the movants have properly proceeded by motion in the cause is established by the decisions in Williams v. Dunn, 163 N. C., 206, 79 S. E., 512, Beckwith v. Mining Co., 87 N. C., 155, and Foard v. Alexander, 64 N. C., 69. And that they are entitled to make such motion is supported by the decisions in Andrews v. Pritchett, 72 N. C., 135, and McCanless v. Flinchum, 98 N. C., 358, 4 S. E., 359.

“It is clearly the duty of a sheriff to conduct his sales in a prudent and just manner, so as to realize a fair price for the property sold. And if he does…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Worthy v. . CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Davis v. Keen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. McCanless v. . FlinchumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Williams v. Charles F. Dunn & Sons Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Black v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Graham v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Swindell v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Creech v. . WilderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Foust v. Gate City Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API