Legal Opinion

Bank of America v. Adamson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2017No. Case No. 20140861PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Justice Durham,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 This case involves a nonjudicial foreclosure sale conducted in violation of Utah Code section 57-1-21, which requires the trustee of the sale to maintain a physical office location within the state. Today we answer the question left open in Federal National Mortgage Association v. Sundquist, 2013 UT 45, 311 P.3d 1004, as to the appropriate remedy for this violation. Because we conclude, under the circumstances of this case, that the violation did not result in a void or voidable trustee’s deed, we hold that the district court…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Ockey v. LehmerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Kleinsmith v. ShurtleffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. State v. TimmermanUtah Supreme Court · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Heslop v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Pinder v. DuchesneUtah Supreme Court · 2020

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API