Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Smidt
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1986No. S-747PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
Fred Rosenberg and Rita Rosenberg appeal from a partial summary judgment entered pursuant to Civil Rule 54(b). The judgment divested them of title to a parcel of real property and revested it in Alvin Smidt and Janice Smidt. Since the trial court’s decision is based on stipulated facts, the appeal presents only legal issues. The parties dispute whether AS 34.20.-070(c) requires a trustee to attempt to discover the current address of a record interest holder before proceeding with a trustee’s sale of encumbered real property. The parties also dispute whether AS…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Alta Sierra Vista, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Young v. EmbleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Gilroy v. RybergNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Cook Schuhmann & Groseclose, Inc. v. Brown & Root, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.