Legal Opinion

Davis v. . Doggett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1937PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Plaintiffs’ exception to tbe refusal of tbe court to sign judgment allowing interest upon tbeir recovery cannot be sustained. It was witbin tbe province of tbe jury to allow interest. Tbe jury having failed to do so, tbe court bad no power to enlarge tbe verdict. Parrish v. Hartman, ante, 248.

G-. O. Doggett, tbe trustee, testified tbat be did not attend tbe foreclosure sale and tbat Mr. Blakeney took bis place at tbe trustee’s sale and sold it as bis agent. Tbe record discloses tbe following admission: Tbe defendants admit tbat W. S. Blakeney, attorney for tbe defendants in tbis case, bid in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Gibson v. . BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Roberson v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Lockridge v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Owens v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Mills v. . Building Loan Assn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Smith v. Greensboro Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Swindell v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Whitlow v. Mountain Trust BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API