Roberson v. . Matthews
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
Did the trial judge rule correctly in setting aside the sale by Jenkins, trustee, to Roberson, and the deed made pursuant thereto ?
There is no evidence that there was any actual fraud, oppression, or unfairness in advertising and selling the land. Moreover, the sale was properly advertised and the deed of trust empowered the trustee to appoint “a day and place of sale,” etc. There was evidence that the note secured by the deed of trust had not been barred by the statute of limitation. Therefore, the power to set aside the sale and deed must be based upon one or all of three theories, to wit,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hicks v. . KearneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Weir v. . WeirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Joyner v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Owens v. Branning Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Morris v. . CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Graham v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Davis v. . DoggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Swindell v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.