Legal Opinion

People v. Richert

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1996No. Docket 155564PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, P.J.

In this case of first impression, we conclude that a prior plea-based misdemeanor conviction, obtained without benefit of counsel but for which no incarceration was imposed, may be used in a subsequent criminal prosecution for purposes of sentence augmentation.

In 1987, defendant pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor of second-degree retail fraud, MCL 750.356d(l); MSA 28.588(4). Acting without counsel, defendant admitted that he had shoplifted a $9.37 tape measure from a department store. The presentence investigation report prepared for the offense reflects only that defendant paid a $205 fine.

In…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. ReichenbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. DaoustMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. JusticeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. XenidisSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API