Legal Opinion

Scott v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1979No. 77-1177PublishedCited by 923 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist

We granted certiorari in this case tó resolve a conflict among state and lower federal courts regarding the proper application of our decision in Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U. S. 25 (1972).1 436 U. S. 925. Petitioner Scott was convicted of theft and fined $50 after a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Ill. His conviction was affirmed by the state intermediate appellate court and then by the Supreme Court of Illinois, over Scott's contention that the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution required that Illinois provide trial counsel to him at its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by923 opinions

  1. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

918 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API