Legal Opinion
State v. Woodruff
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1997No. 23958PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.(1)Defendant Lonnie Woodruff appeals from a judgment and sentence entered after his conviction by a jury of driving while under the influence of. intoxicating liquor (DWI) contrary to NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102 (1994, prior to 1997 amendment). On appeal, he contends he was denied due process of law under the New Mexico Constitution when the district court enhanced his sentence from a first offense to a second offense as a result of a prior conviction for which he was not represented by counsel. We affirm.
I.(2) Following Woodruffs conviction, the State filed a supplemental…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. SarracinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Patterson v. LeMasterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LasnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.